COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF EUPHEMISM: ANALYSIS BASED ON METAPHOR AND METONYMY

Authors

  • Dushatova Shoxsanam Baxtiyor qizi PhD, Fergana state university sh.dushatova@pf.fdu.uz Author

Keywords:

euphemism, cognitive linguistics, metaphor, metonymy, conceptual models, mental processes, discourse, conceptualization, cultural schemas, pragmatic inference.

Abstract

This article investigates the cognitive mechanisms underlying euphemistic language, focusing on metaphor and metonymy as primary tools for expressing socially sensitive or taboo concepts. Euphemisms are not merely stylistic alternatives but reflect complex mental operations that allow speakers to soften, obscure, or reinterpret meaning in culturally acceptable ways. Using a cognitive-linguistic approach, the study examines how conceptual metaphors map abstract or threatening concepts onto more familiar domains, while metonymic processes enable indirect reference through associated elements within a shared conceptual frame. Analysis of authentic language data demonstrates that both metaphor and metonymy facilitate understanding and production of euphemistic expressions, revealing the interaction between cognition, culture, and discourse. Moreover, the study highlights the role of background knowledge, inference, and cultural schemas in decoding euphemisms, emphasizing that comprehension depends on the listener’s mental processing within a given social and cultural context.

References

1. Allan K., Burridge K. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. – Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 320 p.

2. Fauconnier G., Turner, M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. – Basic Books, 2002. – 448 p.

3. Kövecses Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. – Cambridge University Press, 2005. – 256 p.

4. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – University of Chicago Press, 1980. – 220 p.

5. Pfaff C., Gibbs R., Johnson M. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: A Guide to Mental Representations. – John Benjamins, 1997. – 210 p.

6. Romanov D. Euphemisms in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Cognitive and Linguocultural Analysis. – Languages of the World, 2020. – 192 p.

7. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. – Blackwell, 1986. – 307 p.

8. Sweetser E. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. – Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 280 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF EUPHEMISM: ANALYSIS BASED ON METAPHOR AND METONYMY. (2026). ZAMONAVIY TA’LIM TIZIMINI RIVOJLANTIRISH VA UNGA QARATILGAN KREATIV G’OYALAR, TAKLIFLAR VA YECHIMLAR, 8(84), 191-194. https://uzconferences.org/index.php/uzconf/article/view/1164