SOCIOPRAGMATIC DIMENSIONS OF MEDIA DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Maftuna Amriddinovna Bakhronova m.a.baxronova@buxdu.uz Teacher, English Linguistics Department of BukhSU. Author

Keywords:

media discourse; sociopragmatics; pragmatic meaning; presupposition; implicature; ideology; power; audience interpretation

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth sociopragmatic analysis of media discourse, emphasizing the role of language in shaping social meaning, ideological positioning, and power relations. In contemporary media environments, discourse functions not merely as a neutral medium of information exchange but as a strategic tool for influencing audience perception and social behavior. Drawing on key concepts from sociopragmatics and critical discourse studies, the article examines how pragmatic mechanisms such as presupposition, implicature, speech acts, and evaluative language operate across various media genres. The findings suggest that sociopragmatic strategies enable media producers to convey implicit meanings, legitimize particular viewpoints, and subtly manipulate public interpretation. The study highlights the importance of sociopragmatic analysis in understanding the interaction between language, society, and power, and underscores its relevance for developing critical media literacy.

References

1. Levinson, Stephen C.. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–35.

2. Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 20–52.

3. van Dijk, Teun A.. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–27.

4. Thomas, Jenny. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman, pp. 22–58

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

SOCIOPRAGMATIC DIMENSIONS OF MEDIA DISCOURSE. (2026). ZAMONAVIY TA’LIM TIZIMINI RIVOJLANTIRISH VA UNGA QARATILGAN KREATIV G’OYALAR, TAKLIFLAR VA YECHIMLAR, 8(87), 128-130. https://uzconferences.org/index.php/uzconf/article/view/1333